Review of the Universe Story
by Richard Askwith
Have you ever been into something strongly, put it aside for some reason, and then found it impossible to begin again? Just a rhetorical question. I know the answer.
This happened with The Universe Story., by Brian Swimme and Thomas Berry, which Annemarie provided to me on my birthday last year. Not that I quit reading it and put it aside. Actually I read it quite steadily and finished it months ago. But providing some feedback became one of those things which somehow wasn’t happening.
I certainly appreciated reading The Universe Story, which is a passionate and thorough and scientific/history book filled with many fascinating facts, some of which I even wrote down because I knew for sure I would come to doubt my recollections. Such as that a spoon full of earth contains an estimated 50 billion bacteria, or that our sun is one of the hundred billion stars of the Milky Way, the Milky Way itself being one of a hundred billion galaxies. I’m sure if I told someone of those kinds of facts without the book or any written notes, I would think “It couldn’t be ‘galaxies’. It must be stars” or “Maybe it was a hundred million…not a hundred billion”.
But amazing as those facts are they are the stuff of the Discovery Channel and frankly heard before.
But the book went beyond the Discovery channel because of its many insights, as opposed to facts, and by its scope of starting at the big bang and continuing on through the evolution of human civilization. These guys (the authors) are serious about humans being part of the universe, although obviously a tiny, tiny part (a mere two and a half million years for humanoids, 500 thousand for homo erectus, 400 thousand for Lucy, 200 thousand for homo sapiens, 40,000 for north and south America, 11,000 for modern humans, and 140 years for the Republican Party [actually The Universe Story didn’t mention Republicans]), and therefore they didn’t separate human history from the cosmic history.
This idea of seeing that humans are in fact not distinct from nature is not exactly new, but it still constitutes the way the vast majority of we humans think about ourselves. Because of our societal view, with which we are surrounded and influenced, it was helpful to read this book emphasizing how completely wrong and harmful that erroneous view is.
This book certainly rings the alarm bell in familiar areas such as the disastrous effects of overpopulation, deforestation, elimination of entire species, and our insistence upon unrestrained so called progress which is really unrestrained pillaging of non human life forms with no thought for the consequences. However this book is not a gloom and doom thing, and the authors don’t just see the unity as the end conclusion, but rather as a basis for examining where we are going and what we might do or want to do in the future.
They notice the unity of nature in quite scientific terms, but the attractive aspect of this book is they absolutely do not consider scientific occurrences as bereft of emotion or passion or other “human” qualities. They see science as the study of far more than mathematical equations, and as not divorced from beauty and suffering.
For example, they discuss the laws of thermodynamics to enhance our understanding of the sources of violence, and say the sources of violence are resistance, energy and dreams, instead of resistance, entropy (which energy inevitably produces) and autopoiesis or epigenetics. This is helpful because then I can see that violence, also known as change, so often comes from dreams (thoughts of or desires for integration, communism, gay rights or you name it), resistance to those dreams, and energy for the dreams. I can see that yes, my human issues and impulses are at one with the effort of the acorn to break through the resisting earth and transform itself into a tree.
For another example they say the causes of evolution are genetic mutation, natural selection and conscious choice. I find that compelling. It seems a better way of speaking of evolution than to say the causes of evolution are merely genetic mutation and natural selection, because limiting evolution to those two factors doesn’t say anything about why the selection or mutation occurs. Of course, conscious choice doesn’t mean conscious in the way humans are conscious. But certainly, it seems to me, evolution is conscious in the sense that the choices or mutations have a purpose, albeit a purpose beyond the human ken but within the human ability to notice.
Bringing science out of the lab, and into a story, emphasizes or gives weight to the idea that we humans are inextricably a part of nature, not an aberration from nature where we…but nothing else …can possibly think. Where we, but nothing else, can possibly plan.
An unusual and helpful message of the book was the idea that this universe is not, in fact, a series of ever renewing cycles, such that humans have usually thought. Certainly the seasonal changes we experience as earthlings make it seem that way, and philosophers such as Buddhists have for a long time believed that human existence in particular is cyclical, and we come back in different incarnations again and again and again. But really, with what we now understand better about the universe, it seems much more accurate and helpful to think of the universe, and our own lives, and certainly this earth upon which we move, as an irreversible series of transformations. This brings a certain gravity to what we are doing more than spinning in a squirrel cage. What we are will not continue forever or even for long. Although at first glance that seems somewhat depressing, the opposite is true because we have a real part in this universe and what we do has consequences which in fact are irreversible and therefore not redundant or lacking in meaning. Further, we are not doing it alone because we are an integral part of the universe or nature. As Thomas Berry famously said (or words to this effect) “The universe is not a collection of objects. It is a communion of subjects.”
So thank you, Annemarie. I appreciated it.
Springbank Retreat Center in Kingstree, S.C., will offer an Easter Triduum retreat, "Making Easter with Earth: Celebrating our Oneness," **April 1-4,** from Holy Thursday at 3 p.m. through Easter Sunday at noon. The retreat will be led by the Rev. Jim Conlan, Ph.D., Jan Phillips and Karla Barker, OSF. The cost is $350. For more information or to register by phone, call 1-800-671-0361, or go online to www.springbankretreat.org
This pretty much refers to the direction which inspires us. It is about one hour and I recommend turning up the volume and listen reflectively and comfortably rather than watch.